[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements

It defaults to disabled precisely because of Pavel's concerns.



On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 05:30, Jan Rychter wrote:
> >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Machek <> writes:
> Pavel> Hi!
> >> Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to
> >> cancel the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and
> >> can be enabled via a proc entry in 2.4. I won't add code to poll for
> >> ACPI (or APM) events :>
> Pavel> At least no new proc entry, please. Make it depend on
> Pavel> sysrq_enabled and disable it completely if sysrq support is not
> Pavel> compiled in.
> Pavel, I disagree. This is important functionality. I *do* want to abort
> suspends by pressing 'Esc'.
> I do not believe that hiding this gives you any extra security, and I do
> not believe that having it in is any kind of a problem. None of your
> arguments against it convinced me.
> Please do not try to hide it and obscure it any more than it already is
> (Nigel has made this default to off for some reason).
> --J.
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
-- Romans 5:6, NIV.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.112 / U:5.864 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site