lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements
Escape is more intuitively obvious though - I would expect the suspend
button to only start a suspend. And the idea of escape cancelling
anything is well in-grained in peoples' minds.

Of course the other advantage is that reading lid & button switches adds
more code (To implement and to configure - the functions of those keys
ought to be optional?)

Regards,

Nigel

On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 07:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > And no escape. Doing something from keyboard is *ugly*. Magic sysrq is
> > > ugly, too, but its usefull enough to outweight that.
> >
> > Can't you just use the Suspend button? :)
>
> At least that's less ugly than Escape. If it is the same button that
> would wake machine up when it finished suspend... I guess that makes
> sense.
> Pavel
--
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
-- Romans 5:6, NIV.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site