![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote: > > If > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives) > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be > that urgent. XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make this change. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||