![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ulrich Drepper wrote: > With the introduction of the nanosecond fields in struct stat the > utime() syscall is kind of obsolete. It's not possible anymore to > restore the exact access/modification time of a file. Replying to myself: utimes() is already available, on some architectures. The question is why not for archs != alpha, ia64, PA, SPARC? And of course the question of futimes/lutimes remains. - -- - --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/D56a2ijCOnn/RHQRAv9iAJ4iMFqoMSag+z09me48eEImg0I6pgCfacBt WQMXcYFT2+9SGv9zbU3UZX0= =dpAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||