![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:51:53PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote: > There is no problem with the current version of this patch. I rewrote > the original patch to work around the bug in gcc. The bug is that: > > if (size < X) return kmem_cache_alloc(...); > > would not cause the remaining if statements to be marked as dead code, but: > > if (size < X) goto found; > ... > found: return kmem_cache_alloc(...); > > does optimize properly. Ok, I'll drop that part from the next version of the doc. It's not a critical thing that most users will notice. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||