Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: Bug in open() function (?) | | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | | Date | Sat, 12 Jul 2003 02:14:43 -0400 | |
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:23:00 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> We've lived with it for this long.
Well... you have a point there..
> Given that the behaviour is undefined, the behaviour which we should
> implement is clearly "whatever 2.4 is doing". So let's leave it alone.
I suppose I could live with that *IF* somebody fixes 'man 2 open' to
reflect reality.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |