lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [GCC] gcc vs. indentation
Date
From
Samium Gromoff <deepfire@ibe.miee.ru> said:

[...]

> Surprisingly enough i`ve realised soon that indeed some indentation changes
> give gcc a reason to produce different code.

[...]

> --- ./origDAC960.o.d 2003-06-29 21:02:55.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./newDAC960.o.d 2003-06-29 22:13:46.000000000 +0400
> - 52ae: 7d 0d jge 52bd <DAC960_V1_ProcessCompletedCommand+0x7d>
> + 52ae: 7c 0d jl 52bd <DAC960_V1_ProcessCompletedCommand+0x7d>

[...]

> - 542b: 8f 0d 27 00 00 00 popl 0x27
> + 542b: 8e 0d 27 00 00 00 movl 0x27,%cs

[...]

> - 6ba8: bc 11 27 00 00 mov $0x2711,%esp
> + 6ba8: bb 11 27 00 00 mov $0x2711,%ebx

This looks like 1-bit errors to my eye...
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.087 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site