![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote: > For some unknown reason, we stick a -1 in cpu_2_node when we unmap a cpu > on i386. We're better off sticking a 0 in there, because at least 0 is > a valid value if something references it. -1 is only going to cause > problems at some point down the line. Problems down the line help you find the bogus dereference. Even better to stick a poison value in there. -- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : of or relating to the moon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||