[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] New system device API

> Okay, but you should keep "new" functions as similar to existing ones
> as possible. That means 3 parameters for suspend functions, and as
> similar semantics to existing callbacks as possible.

Did you read the earlier posts? They are similar, and simplified because
they don't need the level, since all suspend/resume is expected to happen
with interrupts disabled. The semantics are obvious, the deviation
trivial, and this thread a dead horse.

Please present a case in which that will not work and I will change the

> > So? A keyboard controller is not classified as a system device.
> Its not on pci, I guess it would end up as a system device...

Huh? Since when is everything that's not PCI a system device? Please read
the documentation, esp. WRT system and platform devices.



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.065 / U:2.664 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site