Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Jun 2003 14:15:20 -0700 (PDT) | From | Patrick Mochel <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] New system device API |
| |
> Okay, but you should keep "new" functions as similar to existing ones > as possible. That means 3 parameters for suspend functions, and as > similar semantics to existing callbacks as possible.
Did you read the earlier posts? They are similar, and simplified because they don't need the level, since all suspend/resume is expected to happen with interrupts disabled. The semantics are obvious, the deviation trivial, and this thread a dead horse.
Please present a case in which that will not work and I will change the semantics.
> > So? A keyboard controller is not classified as a system device. > > Its not on pci, I guess it would end up as a system device...
Huh? Since when is everything that's not PCI a system device? Please read the documentation, esp. WRT system and platform devices.
Thanks,
-pat
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |