![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 06:28:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> Seems hardly worth the extra arithmetic given that the 2G limit >> is actually bogus? >> I just did mkswap/swapon of a 52G partition. That used 26MB of lowmem for >> the swap map btw. On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 06:38:27PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > It's not clear precisely who or what would benefit from it; however, > the decreased maximum of 32 swapfiles on i386 is a regression vs. > 2.4.x's limit of 64, in whatever sense something no one cares about is > actually a regression (in principle they could have merely not spoken > up about it). > In other words, if someone feels itchy because the number went down > from 2.4.x, here it is. If not, I'm fine with leaving it be. I went and worked out why it's wrong (_PAGE_PROTNONE) clash. Whatever you do, don't apply it. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||