Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 Jun 2003 14:23:05 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: problem with blk_queue_bounce_limit() |
| |
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:47:04AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > I agree, the idea at the time that Jens and myself did this > work was that the generic device layer would provide interfaces > by which we could test this given a struct device.
Wouldn't that be the dma_is_phys(dev) call I mentioned earlier in this thread that you didn't like? :)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |