[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)
       From: Werner Almesberger <>
    Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:20:26 -0300

    The only thing that worries me in all this is Dave's request to
    make device destruction asynchronous,

    Not a request, they already are asynchronous today in 2.5.x

    unregister_netdevice() rips the device out and returns, and
    the problems we need to fix to make this work %100 are problems
    that exist regardless of whether things operate asynchronously
    or not.

    For example, crap like this was always busted:

    rmmod eth0 </proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/whatever

    and now the asynchornous model forces us to fix this.

    Werner, don't turn this into another one of those absolutely
    rediculious discussions about module semantic threads you
    guys all pile-drove into Rusty several months ago. That stuff
    stunk like pure shit and really unfairly drove Rusty up a wall.

    It really showed how pointless linux-kernel discussion can
    be and how much such rediculious discussions can totally impede
    real progress because someone LOUD disagrees with someone's
    game plan.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.019 / U:15.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site