![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread Patch in this message |
For some unknown reason, we stick a -1 in cpu_2_node when we unmap a cpu
on i386. We're better off sticking a 0 in there, because at least 0 is
a valid value if something references it. -1 is only going to cause
problems at some point down the line. Besides, we initialize the array
with 0's, so undoing it should return it to that same value.
Cheers!
-Matt
--- linux-2.5.70-vanilla/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c Mon Mar 24 14:00:35 2003
+++ linux-2.5.70-vanilla/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c.fixed Wed Apr 2 18:23:06 2003
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@
printk("Unmapping cpu %d from all nodes\n", cpu);
for (node = 0; node < MAX_NR_NODES; node ++)
node_2_cpu_mask[node] &= ~(1 << cpu);
- cpu_2_node[cpu] = -1;
+ cpu_2_node[cpu] = 0;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [W:1.687 / U:0.220 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||