![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 05:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Frederick, Fabian" <Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be> wrote: > > Hi ! > > > > Someone could tell me if the proc/diskstat stuff will be kept in 2.6 > > and above or do we have to refer _only_ > > to sysfs by now ? > > death, taxes and /proc/diskstats. It ain't going away. Out of morbid curiosity, what's the status of union mounts? I've had this sneaking suspicion that /proc would eventually be broken up into two filesystems: 1) what /proc was originally meant for (a subdirectory for each pid), 2) all the extra crap that got shoehorned into it back when it was the only synthetic filesystem (and after everybody got into the habit of putting synthetic fs stuff into /proc). Of course making this work with legacy tools would require union mounting both procfs and crapfs onto /proc. Which gets us back to "how are union mounts doing"? Rob > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||