![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I don't really care which is faster, so please don't cc me in any replieds to this thread, I 'm just telling my experience. I've tried OpenGFS on an external firewire hard drive, and I got 13 MB/s(it was read, but it shows that the bus can at least handle that much) on a WD310100 (which is a pretty old 10GB udma33 hard drive). That would probably be even better with ext2 or some fs other than OpenGFS. --Brian Jackson On Sunday 29 June 2003 05:24 am, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > Hello Daniel , > > On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Daniel Egger wrote: > > Am Sam, 2003-06-28 um 22.31 schrieb Alan Cox: > > > I'm testing the USB2 disk idea at the moment. Big problem is > > > performance - 5Mbytes/second isnt the best backup rate in the world. > > > > Which are 300Mbytes/minute, still faster than many tapes. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > 5MB/Sec is faster than MOST tapes drivs ? Or ??? > If you are talking older scsi-2 or 1 drives yes . > But on a properly tuned system any of the newer tape drives s/b > able beat that hands down . > > > I've also made the experience that IEEE1394 (aka Firewire/iLink) is > > always faster than USB2. > > I'd like to see a raising hands that have this functional at > anywhere near line (60% is close enough) rate ? > Tia , JimL -- OpenGFS -- http://opengfs.sourceforge.net Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41 [W:0.552 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||