lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 28 Jun 2003 12:47:26 -0700
FromLarry McVoy <>
SubjectRe: bkbits.net is down
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 08:38:57PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Tapes are a pain; but at the type of 40GB range is it worth considering
> a pile of external USB/Firewire hard drives?

Maybe it's not obvious to the none BK users.  BK _replicates_ the database
of revision history.

	cd /tmp
	bk clone /repos/l/linux/linux-2.5 
	rm -rf /repos/l/linux/linux-2.5
	bk clone /tmp/linux-2.5 /repos/l/linux/linux-2.5

That's a noop.  Nothing was lost.  And BK is excellent at incremental
updates, far better than anything else in existence.  

And BK does in file and cross file integrity checks.

So backing up using BK to another mirror is faster, simpler, and more
reliable.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36    [from the cache]
©2003-2008