[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.4.22-pre2 unresolved proc_get_inode
    Fine by me :-)
    Don't use it, don't need it.
    As a matter of course, I throw a standard Suse config in and answer
    "m"/"y" to the new stuff. Serves to shake out a few things.


    At 12:21 28.06.2003 +0100, Viro wrote:
    >On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:40:36PM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote:
    > > if [ -r ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F 2.4.22-pre2; fi
    > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
    > > /lib/modules/2.4.22-pre2/kernel/drivers/net/wan/comx.o
    > > depmod: proc_get_inode
    > >
    > > I suppose we let Christoph and Marc fight it out.
    >You know what? I'm so fed up with that crap, that today Marcelo will
    >get a patch killing proc_get_inode(), making proc_lookup() static and
    >eliminating ->proc_iops completely.
    >Enough is enough. comx is the only user of that crap and all procfs
    >code in comx is broken by design and trivially exploitable. It's
    >unsalvagable and any attempt to fix it will amount to rewrite from
    >scratch anyway.
    >It's not a new problem, it had been discussed to hell and back and
    >comx folks could not have been arsed to do anything about it in what,
    >3 years?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.021 / U:36.672 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site