lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 27 Jun 2003 14:28:29 +0400
FromSamium Gromoff <>
SubjectRe: [BIO] request->flags ambiguity
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:48:22 +0200
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
-- snip --
> > 	Is it ok to have a possibility of a request with conflicting
> > 	meanings attached to it?  For example REQ_CMD | REQ_PM_SHUTDOWN
> > 	| REQ_SPECIAL.
> 
> No of course not.
-- snip --
> > 	Shouldn`t it make more sense to separate request-type-indicator
> > 	flags into a separate unambiguous type field, which would take
> > 	one of the following values: - read/write request - sense query
> > 	- power control - special request
> > 
> > 	And not a currently possible combination of all of them, which
> > 	seem to be the current situation.
> 
> There has been talk of that before, search the archives.

	Umm, i`ve tried and failed, couldn`t you share some vague pointers about the topic
 or something?

	I`m sorry, but my curiosity prevailed over hesitation to bother you :-)
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 
> 
--
regards, Samium Gromoff


-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36    [from the cache]
©2003-2008