Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:42:48 +0200 | Subject | Re: O(1) scheduler & interactivity improvements | From | Helge Hafting <> |
| |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:41:45PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote: > > > Helge Hafting wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:44:14PM +0100, John Bradford wrote: > > > >>Well, no, opaque window moving is fine if the CPU isn't at 100%. If > >>it is, I'd rather see choppy window movements than have a server > >>application starved of CPU. That's just my preference, though. > >> > > > >That could be an interesting hack to a window manager - > >don't start the move in opaque mode when the load is high. > > This isn't really an issue if the graphics engine is doing the work and > the X server doesn't busy-wait on the bitblt to finish (ie. does DMA or > calls ioctl to sleep until command-fifo-has-free-space interrupt).
The problem isn't window movement, but all the stuff you uncover forcing repainting all over the place.
Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |