![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Per struct address_space? This is an unnecessary limitation. On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > It's a sensible limitation, it keeps the radix tree lookup simple. It severely limits its usefulness. Dropping in a more flexible data structure should be fine. On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> This gives me the same data structure proliferation chills as bh's. On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > It's not nearly as bad. There is no distinction between subpage and base > struct page for almost all page operations, e.g., locking, IO, data access. But those are code sanitation issues. You need to make sure this doesn't explode on PAE. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||