lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 24 Jun 2003 18:10:31 -0700
FromWilliam Lee Irwin III <>
SubjectRe: [RFC] My research agenda for 2.7
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Per struct address_space? This is an unnecessary limitation.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> It's a sensible limitation, it keeps the radix tree lookup simple.

It severely limits its usefulness. Dropping in a more flexible data
structure should be fine.


On Wednesday 25 June 2003 02:47, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This gives me the same data structure proliferation chills as bh's.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:07:18AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> It's not nearly as bad.  There is no distinction between subpage and base 
> struct page for almost all page operations, e.g., locking, IO, data access.

But those are code sanitation issues. You need to make sure this
doesn't explode on PAE.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36    [from the cache]
©2003-2008