lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Crusoe's performance on linux?
    Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
    > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:58:12AM +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
    >>Desktop - Pentium III 1 G Hz 754 MB -> 10.x min.
    >>Tablet PC - Crusoe TM5800 1 GHz 731 MB -> 17.x min.
    >> From freshdiagnos benchmack, the TPC has about 2x faster RAM.
    >>I use tmpfs for the whole process so disk speed didn't count.
    >>Both test run without X or any foreground process using
    >>2.4.21-ac1 and RedHat kernel.
    > Desktop - 1.1 GHz Athlon Tbird 512M RAM, using disk -> 3.7 min
    > This is with gcc 2.95.2, which may give it an unfair advantage, though.
    > Or is something else wrong here?

    Both use gcc 3.2. The desktop pentium III is very old. Slow ram/bus may
    be the
    reason. Or this may be the fastest a pentium iii 1 MHz can perform?.
    Large RAM don't help pentium III. It doesn't need them here.
    Large RAM should help Cursoe a lot. CMS should use those RAM as traslation
    cache and put the entire processes (make, gcc, as) in it.
    I guess 17.x min kernel compile time result from CMS still taking time
    interpreting x86
    code (because it decide to do so to conserve translation cache space?).
    I wish the linux kernel could hint CMS to do a better job, if possible, like
    when to interpret, translate or fully optimize and save-to-disk for
    later use.




    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.021 / U:59.544 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site