[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GCC speed (was [PATCH] Isapnp warning)
    Daniel Phillips <> wrote:
    > As for compilation speed, yes, that sucks. I doubt there's any rational
    > reason for it, but I also agree with the idea that correctness and binary
    > code performance should come first, then the compilation speed issue should
    > be addressed.

    No. Compilation inefficiency directly harms programmer efficiency and the
    quality and volume of code the programmer produces. These are surely the
    most important things by which a toolchain's usefulness should be judged.

    I compile with -O1 all the time and couldn't care the teeniest little bit
    about the performance of the generated code - it just doesn't matter.

    I'm happy allowing those thousands of people who do not compile kernels all
    the time to shake out any 3.2/3.3 compilation problems.

    Compilation inefficiency is the most serious thing wrong with gcc.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.019 / U:0.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site