lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [OT] Re: Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM]
    On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:

    > GPL has an inherent long-term strategy, you are talking of short-term,
    > Larry. That does not match. If I am using only GPL-software I know I am
    > able to use it as is in five years from now.

    Really? Are you sure it would still compile with gcc-5.1.7 at that time?
    Are you sure somebody will take care it will still work with latest
    hardware then? Are you sure somebody will fix all the security issues
    which came up over the years? Are you sure somebody will help you out in
    case you are stuck with a new problem then?

    Do you feel comfortable depending on that helpful unknown somebody? What
    if the one who released the stuff doesn't support it any longer because he
    gave away the hardware or got tired having to fix his stuff over and over
    again due to api volatility even months after so-called feature freeze or
    simply due to changed personal preferences?

    Of course, you are still better of with the GPL'ed sources available but
    this alone doesn't buy you anything. In real world the difference between
    "still possible to support" (thanks to GPL f.e.) and "getting good
    (relyable in quality and time) support" tends to be non-trivial ;-)

    So I don't see any long term strategy there inherent in the GPL. Simply
    throwing RTFS in front of the people is definitedly better than nothing,
    but doesn't qualify as a strategy to me. But maybe I'm missing something.

    > If I depend on being nice to commercial
    > companies, it may well turn out, that they are not being nice to me no matter
    > what I do.

    Well, as a test you might want to try asking (say here on lkml) to get the
    GPL'ed defxx-driver working. I might be wrong but it may well turn out
    nobody would be nice doing it for you, no matter what you do ;-)

    > In other words: it's all about being free or being dependant on goodwill.

    Nope, at least from a user's POV: While you are always free to decide to
    use it or not - you are always depending on somebody providing you the
    support you need to keep the stuff working for you...

    For somebody willing and capable to do the maintenance himself it's still
    imposing some dependency/constraint to him, because one needs to allocate
    time to both keep up with the development process and do the actual work.
    Which in turn means being dependent on other people's or institutions'
    goodwill so you can afford said amount of time.

    Martin

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.025 / U:0.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site