Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:43:45 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning |
| |
Em Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:41:02PM -0500, Chris Wedgwood escreveu: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:11:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good > > stuff like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff > > could be done in an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc > > 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm if gcc 2.96 accepts this? > > What *requires* 2.96 still? Is it a large number of people or obscure > architecture?
I don't know, I was just trying to figure out the impact of requiring gcc 3 to compile the kernel. I never used gcc 2.96 btw.
- Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |