[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules and various cleanups
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 06:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>Chris Wright <> wrote:
>>>security_capable() returns 0 if that capability bit is set.
>>That's just bizarre. Is there any logic behind it?
> The LSM access control hooks all return 0 on success (i.e. permission
> granted) and negative error code on failure, like most of the rest of
> the kernel interfaces (e.g. consider permission())

Maybe it should be called "security_incapable() and then the return code can be
treated as a boolean true/false....


Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.034 / U:5.524 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site