Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:10:26 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Make gcc3.3 Eliminate Unused Static Functions |
| |
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:15:16AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:07:19AM -0700, Robert Love wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 09:03, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > ... only if we say a min gcc version of 3.3 however, yes? Otherwise the > > > kernel gets rather bloated. Just how wide-spread (and Good To Use) is > > > gcc-3.3 now? > > > > Good point. > > > > I have been using gcc-3.3 for awhile now with success, and I can > > recommend it at least for x86, but that really is not reason to force > > anyone to move to it (yet). > > But how much have you rebuilt, heavily tested, etc? I know that > currently Debian/sid is building XFree86 4.1 at -O on all arches due to
s/4.1/4.2.1/
> gcc-3.3 issues (some xdm auth problem on ppc and x86, other things > elsewhere). >... > Tom Rini
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |