![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org> > > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > > > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with > > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter. > > > > > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect. > > > > > > > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net? > > We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net. Why would you *not* have bk.kernel.org as a CNAME? For ease of memory, etc, it makes sense to do that. If someone knows about cvs.kernel.org, they are more likely to guess the bk address. And vice-versa, of course. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [W:0.235 / U:0.180 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||