[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue
Greg KH wrote:

> But you also have to "hold" events for a bit of time in order to
> determine that things are out of order, or we have a gap. So a bit of
> "complex" logic is in the works, but it's much less complex than if we
> didn't have that sequence number.

OK, so the important point here is that while you probably delay events
for a small amount of time (1-3 seconds maybe) to ensure that you aren't
processing steps out of order, it's not likely that userspace is going
hold event #1321 for an indefinite period of time just because it has
never seen event #1320.

I can't wait to see this implementation; it's going to be interesting,
to say the least. However, without the sequence numbers, it would very
likely be impossible.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.066 / U:4.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site