[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Sco vs. IBM
    On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, James Simmons wrote:

    > > MLP> Ok .. here we got us a few more articles about the stuff going on. A
    > > MLP> friend pointed me at these:
    > >
    > > I think that this one
    > >
    > > <>
    > >
    > > is very illuminating.
    > How pathetic!!! He is just like the people who going into stores to stage
    > accidents and then sue the store.He makes a living by sueing. I dobut he
    > can sue every big UNIX implementor/user. he has to go again SUN, IBM and
    > other big names.

    They forgot INTERACTIVE Unix! This is/was a Kodak Company. When word
    gets out, they may even sue Kodak. They claim that any form of
    Unix (whatever that is), now belongs to them because one of their
    predecessors purchased a license. Get this, it was a non-exclusive
    license even!

    Maybe they think all Judges are stupid?? Probably not, it's likely
    just the death throes of a company that drank a fatal dose of corruption.

    FYI, I noticed an unauthorized reproduction of some of my code. It
    used a variable, "i", in a "for" loop. Maybe I should go buy a lawyer.
    I can show that only persons who had been previously been poisoned
    by FORTRAN would ever use such a variable name. This certainly
    points to me.

    Dick Johnson
    Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
    Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.021 / U:9.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site