![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
At 09:18 AM 14/06/2003 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Not really... one retransmit and the TCP header size grows > > due to the SACK options. > >OK scratch that idea. why not have a performance option that is a tradeoff between optimum payload size versus efficiency. unless i misunderstand the problem, you can certainly pad the TCP options with NOPs ... > > I find it truly bletcherous what you're trying to do here. > >I think so too, but its hard to ignore ~100Mbit/sec in performance. another option is for the write() path is for instantant-send TCP sockets to delay the copy_from_user() until the IP+TCP header size is known. i wouldn't expect the net folks to like that, however .. cheers, lincoln. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||