![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 12 June 2003 06:27:46 +0000, Michael Knigge wrote: > imho the patch have to be included in 2.4.21 and (imho) it is a bad > practice to release a piece of software with a known bug (especially > if a fix is available). Is it good practice not to release, when the last version has even more known bugs? It's a trade-off and those are hard to get objectively correct. Personally, I still like the idea of a bugfix-only patch against 2.4.current [1], but in it's current state it just isn't taken serious by 90% of kernel.org kernel users. [1] http://www.hardrock.org/kernel/current-updates/ Jörn -- Eighty percent of success is showing up. -- Woody Allen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:36 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||