Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:02:45 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: Is there a maintainer for serverworks.c |
| |
I authored the mess.
The GPL extra names are because back in the Andrew Balsa days of the 2.0.33,4,5-Jumbo patch series Aubry, Andrzey, et al, we all worked togather.
Only Sun (osb4,csb5a) and I (osb4,csb5,csb6,csb6a) are the true authors.
I am just lazy and do not delete people's names.
What is wrong with it all now?
Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group
On 10 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2003-06-10 at 20:18, James Washer wrote: > > > > > > I see the 2.4.20 kernel ships with serverworks.c version 0.3, which > > is GPL'd, RH9.0 ships with version 0.7 ( with no mention of GPL) > > > > Does anyone know the story on this? Who authored 0.7? Is it GPL'd?? > > 0.7 is based on 0.3. Its by Michel Aubry, Andrzey, Sun and Red Hat. Not > sure where the usual 4 line GPL blurb went. 2.4.21rc has 0.8 btw. > > Alan >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |