lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
Shachar Shemesh wrote:

> I'm currently trying to work with some other subscribers of this list on
> a design. Getting 1, 2 and 3 is a complicated enough task, of course. I
> would like to hear estimates about inclusion chances should we manage to
> come up with an implmentation that lives up to all the above.

How many users would want to actually modify the syscall parameters
or change visible system behavior when a syscall happens?

Maybe something like this would work?

1. You can register to be notified when a syscall occurs,
either before or after or both.
2. The only action you can take must be 'private' (within
your driver or subsystem.)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.023 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site