lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
    On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:48:11PM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote:

    > Don't have followed the whole thread, so I don't know if somebody has already
    > said this, but all this thing about hooks looks perfect for projects like
    > bproc or mosix, have you talked to them ?
    > (perhaps Erik Hendriks <erik@hendriks.cx> -bproc- is following the
    thread...;) )

    I don't know about bproc, but at least MOSIX is, as it currently
    stands, a kernel patch. Therefore, they can (and do) hijack the
    syscall table safely. If I remember the code correctly, they do it in
    entry.S, not in the sys_call_table itself.
    --
    Muli Ben-Yehuda
    http://www.mulix.org

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:6.372 / U:0.560 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site