Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 May 2003 11:20:47 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export. |
| |
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:59:43AM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Terje Eggestad wrote: > > I guess something like this: > > > > typedef int (*syscall_hook_t)(void * arg1, void * arg2, void * arg3, > > void * arg4, void * arg5, void * arg6); > > > > #define HOOK_IN_FLAG 0x1 > > #define HOOK_OUT_FLAG 0x2 > > > > opaquehandle = int register_syscall_hook(int syscall_nr, syscall_hook_t > > hook_function, int flags); > > int unregister(int opaquehandle); > > > > I'd make a stab at it if I knew that it stood a chance of getting > > accepted. > > I dont think it has.
I think it could, actually - who maintains fortunes these days? It's a bit too long, though... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |