[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Using GPL'd Linux drivers with non-GPL, binary-only kernel wrote:
    > On Wed, 07 May 2003 02:21:25 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said:
    > > Beyond that the whole closed thing is a turn-off. Which is likely to
    > > reduce interest in your research OS and get you no free feedback on
    > > the weird situations.
    > The target kernel doesn't actually *have* to be closed. What if the
    > kernel running the Linux driver was some open-but-incompatible licence?

    Regarding Eric's point, I think it comes down to what captures the
    imagination of potential users. Even a GPL'd project is not likely to
    get much interest if it doesn't offer anything worth using.
    Conversely, see BeOS for something which was not ultimately a
    commercial success, but which captured the imagination of a lot of
    people despite being closed source.

    > I'll just pause to point out that the single most successful TCP stack
    > has to be the BSD one - which started off as DARPA-funded research, and got
    > lots of feedback in spite of its license.

    I disagree. Many of the most successful TCP stacks _forked_ from the
    BSD one at some time or other (e.g. SunOS, Microsoft), but then they
    evolved in their own directions, with their unique quirks.

    -- Jamie

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.020 / U:8.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site