[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:03:15PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <> you write:
> ..
> Doesn't break with sparce CPU #s, but yes, it is inefficient.

If you don't reduce NR_CPUS with CONFIG_NR_CPUS, you waste space (32 bit folks
won't like it) and if you say change CONFIG_NR_CPUS to 2,
and we have cpuid 4 on a 2 way you break right? If we have to address these
issues at all, why can't we use the simpler kmalloc_percpu patch
which I posted in the morning and avoid so much complexity and arch


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.060 / U:5.468 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site