[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
    On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:03:15PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
    > In message <> you write:
    > ..
    > Doesn't break with sparce CPU #s, but yes, it is inefficient.

    If you don't reduce NR_CPUS with CONFIG_NR_CPUS, you waste space (32 bit folks
    won't like it) and if you say change CONFIG_NR_CPUS to 2,
    and we have cpuid 4 on a 2 way you break right? If we have to address these
    issues at all, why can't we use the simpler kmalloc_percpu patch
    which I posted in the morning and avoid so much complexity and arch


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.018 / U:4.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site