lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmalloc_percpu
    On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 06:03:15PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
    > In message <20030506050744.GA29352@in.ibm.com> you write:
    > ..
    > Doesn't break with sparce CPU #s, but yes, it is inefficient.
    >

    If you don't reduce NR_CPUS with CONFIG_NR_CPUS, you waste space (32 bit folks
    won't like it) and if you say change CONFIG_NR_CPUS to 2,
    and we have cpuid 4 on a 2 way you break right? If we have to address these
    issues at all, why can't we use the simpler kmalloc_percpu patch
    which I posted in the morning and avoid so much complexity and arch
    dependency?

    Thanks,
    Kiran

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.033 / U:61.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site