lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: partitions in meta devices
>       No, it should not.  And devfs, for once, has nothing to do with it.
> RAID devices (md*) have _one_ (1) minor allocated to each. Consequently,
> they could not be partitioned by any kernel - there is no device numbers
> to be assigned to their partitions.
>
> > Could you please tell us which kernel version you're using?
>
> What would be much more interesting, which kernel are _you_ using
> and what device numbers, in your experience, do these partitions get?

These patches appear to contain raid partitioning code of some sort:

http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/patches/linux-stable/

Only the first 16 md devices can be partitioned, though... major is 60,
minors are 0-15 for md0, 16-31 for md1, etc.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.067 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site