Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [BUGS] 2.5.69 syncppp | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 28 May 2003 22:37:06 +0100 |
| |
On Mer, 2003-05-28 at 22:24, Paul Fulghum wrote: > The spinlock in cp_timeout() does not synchronize > with input from sppp_input(), but *does* synchronize > with sppp_keepalive() which is run off another timer.
In which case you can also use the del_timer return to do a del_timer_sync/add_timer based protection in some situations
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |