Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 May 2003 09:59:21 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.70-mm1 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote: > >>WimMark I report for 2.5.70 >> >>Runs: 1005.78 958.80 947.23 >> >>WimMark I report for 2.5.70-mm1 >> >>Runs (deadline): 717.27 1064.57 1089.13 >>Runs (anticipatory): 1342.93 1121.47 1330.42 >>... >> WimMark I run results are archived at >>http://oss.oracle.com/~jlbec/wimmark/wimmark_I.html >> > >This is nuts. WimMark keeps on showing 2:1 swings in throughput when no >other test shows any variation at all. I simply do not know what to make >of it. > >Your results would appear to indicate that the regression between >2.5.69-mm5 and 2.5.69-mm8 was actually due to something in Linus's tree, >and it is now in 2.5.70. > >I have an interdiff here between the linus.patch from mm5 and mm8 and it >contains nothing very interesting. > It might be something from your tree that got into Linus' _after_ mm8?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |