lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [CHECKER] 12 potential leaks in kernel 2.5.69
From
Date
> >             schedule();
> > barrier();
>
> Iirc, the above will leak 4 bytes (plus overhead) once per kernel
> boot and controller. This only happens for broken hardware and the
> alternative is memory corruption, depending on how broken the hardware
> is. Wontfix.
>
> Alan, was that correct?

It should only leak in the error path case. If the controller didnt reply
then it still owns that ram and for the sake of a few bytes its better to
play safe yes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.138 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site