[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: recursive spinlocks. Shoot.
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Robert White wrote:

> In point of fact, "proper" locking, when combined with "proper"
> definitions of an interface dictate that recursive locking is "better".
> Demanding that a call_EE_ know what locks a call_ER_ (and all
> antecedents of caller) will have taken is not exactly good design.

So call_EE_ messes with the data structure which call_ER_
has locked, unexpectedly because the recursive locking
doesn't show up as an error.

Looks like recursive locking would just make debugging

Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.091 / U:2.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site