[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: recursive spinlocks. Shoot.
    On Mon, 19 May 2003, Robert White wrote:

    > In point of fact, "proper" locking, when combined with "proper"
    > definitions of an interface dictate that recursive locking is "better".
    > Demanding that a call_EE_ know what locks a call_ER_ (and all
    > antecedents of caller) will have taken is not exactly good design.

    So call_EE_ messes with the data structure which call_ER_
    has locked, unexpectedly because the recursive locking
    doesn't show up as an error.

    Looks like recursive locking would just make debugging

    Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.018 / U:119.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site