[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc
Date writes:

> On Mon, 19 May 2003 17:55:06 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said:
> > If things must be maintained in concert it is a bug.
> >
> > With a fixed ABI people take advantage of new features as they
> > care for them. And in general to use new features requires new code.
> And if the kernel headers aren't maintained in concert with the kernel,
> new userspace code can't reach the new features.
> Therefor, by your definition, the current situation is a bug.

Yes, glibc uses kernel headers.

> Try compiling code that uses futexes on a system that has a kernel that
> supports them, but kernel-headers that haven't been upgraded to mention them.
> The kernel has the new code, the userspace has the new code, but gcc will
> turn around and whinge about the new code because there's a piece missing in
> between. So people *CANT* take advantage of the new features (unless they
> do something silly like drag their own foo.h file around where it can get
> out of sync with reality).

Or the build against a library that does that. There are not that
many libraries.

For a lot of system calls it is actively dangerous to assume dev_t ==
__kernel_dev_t. As glibc does some cute things in there.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.079 / U:2.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site