[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Recent changes to sysctl.h breaks glibc
    Date writes:

    > On Mon, 19 May 2003 17:55:06 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said:
    > > If things must be maintained in concert it is a bug.
    > >
    > > With a fixed ABI people take advantage of new features as they
    > > care for them. And in general to use new features requires new code.
    > And if the kernel headers aren't maintained in concert with the kernel,
    > new userspace code can't reach the new features.
    > Therefor, by your definition, the current situation is a bug.

    Yes, glibc uses kernel headers.

    > Try compiling code that uses futexes on a system that has a kernel that
    > supports them, but kernel-headers that haven't been upgraded to mention them.
    > The kernel has the new code, the userspace has the new code, but gcc will
    > turn around and whinge about the new code because there's a piece missing in
    > between. So people *CANT* take advantage of the new features (unless they
    > do something silly like drag their own foo.h file around where it can get
    > out of sync with reality).

    Or the build against a library that does that. There are not that
    many libraries.

    For a lot of system calls it is actively dangerous to assume dev_t ==
    __kernel_dev_t. As glibc does some cute things in there.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.019 / U:19.292 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site