![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>> For the connoisseur, I've attached before/after disassemblies >>> demonstrating that the if () whose failure is caused by (2) is a very, >>> very, very real problem. > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 12:18:57AM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> This was obvious from code inspection. > > ISTR a debate where it was claimed the constant would be implicitly > promoted. Promotion to long is all that is guaranteed at least up to C89. I don't think that C99 has changed this. The use of ULL in the code is required. -- Justin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||