[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: encrypted swap [was: The disappearing sys_call_table export.]
    > > Do you see more options ?
    > > Anyway, it should probably be policy controlled.
    > These are all very good options, ofcourse things get hairy don't they :)

    Certainly. Option 3 certainly doesn't have to be implemented in the first
    version :)
    In fact, the first version could ignore the core dump issue and setrlimit
    will be used to avoid core dumps of sensitive processes. In the future,
    it can be handled more gracefully.

    > Perhaps in the beginning either 1, 2 and 4 as per a system wide dump
    > policy. May be even a setrlimit extension and use that as a jump point to
    > make a per user policy?

    Makes sense. Only when 3 is implemented, a special /proc interface is
    required. For everything else, setrlimit will suffice.

    > Cheers,
    > Ahmed.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.018 / U:45.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site