[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector
    On Sun, 11 May 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:

    > Jos Hulzink wrote:
    > > On Sunday 11 May 2003 05:50, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > > Hmm.. Doesnt' a _real_ hardware reset actually use a magic segment that
    > > > isn't even really true real mode? I have this memory that the reset value
    > > > for a i386 has CS=0xf000, but the shadow base register actually contains
    > > > 0xffff0000. In other words, the CPU actually starts up in "unreal" mode,
    > > > and will fetch the first instruction from physical address 0xfffffff0.
    > > >
    > > > At least that was true on an original 386. It's something that could
    > > > easily have changed since.
    > I got my info from an article on the net which says that a 386 does
    > behave as you say, but it is possible for the system designer to
    > arrange that it boots into the 286-compatible vector at physical
    > address 0x000ffff0. It states that the feature is specifically so
    > that system designers don't have to create a "memory hole" (that's as
    > much detail as it gives).

    Guys, mem[0xfffffff0,...] == mem[0x000ffff0,...] since the hw remaps the
    bios. Being picky about Intel specs, it should be f000:fff0 though.

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.020 / U:34.108 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site