[lkml]   [2003]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel source tree splitting
> >> I have seven source trees on disk right now.  Getting rid off all
> >>the archs but i386 would not only save tons of space, it would also
> >>make 'grep -r' go faster and stop spewing irrelevant hits for archs
> >>that I couldn't care less about.
> >
> > I agree with you. Making different trees for different archs will make the tarball much smaller. Usually people only use one architecture and the other code lies waste. I think this has been discussed many times but It really is worth doing.
> How about a script to just prune it once you download it. That will at least fix your
> disk space & grep issue, and will not affect those of us who like to see it all.

Agreed - we don't want to obfuscate getting the whole kernel tree for
anybody who wants to - some of us have loads of bandwidth, and do
compile for multiple architectures :-).

> If you want to save download bandwidth, just use incremental diffs and/or something
> like bk or one of the cvs exports.

Even the current 2.5 source tree is downloadable during a, (long),
lunch break over ISDN, (or a very long lunch break over a 56K modem
:-) ).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.040 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site