Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Apr 2003 21:56:50 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: bk pull |
| |
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:49:58PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > Sure, I too would like it if the kernel would always build > out-of-the-box, but I don't think it's very realistic. Even if I > followed Linus's checkins on an hourly basis (no way in hell I'm ever > gonna do that), there is always a chance that he'll accept a patch > that will (perhaps subtly) break non-x86 platforms.
Hey, I didn't mean _always_ build out of the box :) I'm much more looking forward to 2.6.x releases I'd like to see just build for ia64.
> I'm working on) and the virtual mem_map support. The latter I haven't > pushed at all so far, mostly because I just haven't had the > time/energy/interest to do so. Also, I'm always optimistic someone > else comes along to help with the work... ;-)
Well, I could try to help pushing some stuff. OTOH pushing stuff I don't understand is a bad idea. Could you please explain e.g. the mm/bootmem.c and mm/page_alloc.c changes?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |