![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 06:48:33AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > Robert i suppose you can add another notch on your erm.. bedpost(?) > and congratulations to all the kernel developers! It survived some > local networking stress tests, but there is more fun stuff like tty > layer to completely obliterate ;) Wow! This has had a hard time historically. I'm really glad NUMA-Q's are now immune (in the sense of correctness) to this config; previously it was believed that preemption points in printk(linux_banner) would take out the machine early in boot if preemption was enabled. Congratulations rml! If you're booting without issues on these things, you are a _very_ long way toward being race-free. This is incredibly good news, both for the preemption support, and for the general stability of the i386 bootstrap. All that's really left is driver and non-i386 arch coverage if I'm right. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||