![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, dean gaudet wrote: > On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Mark Grosberg wrote: > > > I would think on large, multi-user systems that are spawning processes all > > day, this might improve performance if the shells on such a system were > > patched. > > more relevant is a large multithreaded (or async model with many > connections per thread/process) webserver spawning cgi. otherwise you pay Heh. I just happen to have written a multi-threaded webserver (called Seminole), but it does CGI "in process." Actually, it runs on VxWorks too where there is no concept of a process. :-) But you're right. This could be a boon for any non-in-process (non mod_perl or PHP) webservers. The idea would be that the file mapping array would be easier to scan (kind of like how poll() is a lot easier than select()). > if you look at such webservers they tend to have a separate process just > for the purpose of spawning cgi/etc. and use some IPC to pass the data to > the cgi spawner. Yup. I suppose for Apache this could be an alternate interface of the APR spawn process function. L8r, Mark G. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:35 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||